Apotheosis
July - October 2002
P
rose

                     

 

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

My Cousin Told Me… - Paul Nachbar

The Pican Dialogues: Reprise   -   Paul Nachbar

The Case for Anti-Semetism  -  Paul Nachbar

Toy Soldiers/Goods and Services   -  Paul Nachbar

Ah, Freedom... -  Paul Nachbar

An Essay on Worry - Paul Nachbar

"It's Only High IQ Drivel But I Like - Paul Nachbar    

Below is an autobiographical fragment - Paul Nachbar

Thought You Might Like To See This - Paul Nachbar   

World Trade Center Issues - Jonathan Marin

Jon's Auto-Chef - Jonathan Marin

Fun Fun Fun - Quinn Tyler Jackson

 


My Cousin Told Me… Paul Nachbar

    My cousin told me that they were merely stingless "social workers" but either he was lying or some others had flown in from another hive. Indeed, he told me as well that others of these "social-workers" (psychologists, psychiatrists, mental health workers, salesmen, professors, teachers, policemen, businessmen, artists,actors, scientists, lawyers, to be very literal and name names) were also stingless.. Why I listened to my cousin I do not know for sure, but he seemed to know what he was talking about, that is, he was a good beekeeper as I certainly was not. Or at least didn't believe myself to be.  
   Anyway, since he had told me this over and over again in a highly authoritative manner---and was supported here by various uncles and aunts- I could not quite unbelieve him, despite no small handful of stinging experiences. What could one do anyway? Smoke out the hive, spray them all with some lethal chemical or another? As tempting as that was, it would prevent one from getting the honey that one really wanted..because I certainly couldn't produce that. So I kept visiting the hives of the stingless social workers and was lucky--or unstung--half the time--and unlucky--or stung--the other half. And one could say, it is better to have gotten some honey and then lost it, than never to have gotten any honey at all.
   Certainly, my cousin's little lie had augmented whatever courage I naturally possessed. Because I did not want to disbelieve my cousin, I kept thinking that somewhere, somehow, there were hives filled with stingless bees and that these in turn would always be quite grateful for my visits as well as willing to give me of their surplus. After all, I would return the favor by protecting them, that is, from genuinely nasty intruders.
   Well, here in the infirmary, among the dazed and sickly drones, where I ended up after quite a few too many such forays and quite a few too many such stings, I mainly scratch the scabs.which grew over them and the pain makes me frequently. quite irritable.  And then I think, it is far better to have gotten such  scabs from all this  stinging stuff than never to have   ventured forth at all .Wouldn't you agree? Besides, I never cared much for tattoos and other perhaps similar  forms of "self-mutilation"...
   On the other hand, should not the saying go, 'lucky at IQ tests, unlucky at love?'
Or is it cold hands, warm heart? I forget...Doesn't matter.

Back To Top


The Pican Dialogues: Reprise      Paul Nachbar

 For those who have not had a chance to look at my earlier Pican Dialogues, a series of science fiction chapters which I may or may not organize into a more coherent work...you can find them under the 'poetry' forums at the Cerebrals Society or else please contact me. To refresh the memories of those who have seen these, or to introduce those who are new to this work , I will just state that the "action" occurs on the Planet Pico, located in the Andromeda galaxy, several million light years from earth's sun. Among the characters are a couple of Pican scientists as well as The Master, a rather unusual character/creature who actually rules Pico in a rather, um, indirect manner..Eventually, in three billion years or so, when astonomers anticipate that Andromeda will collide with the Milky Way, our own galaxy, the Picans are planning major and enlightening events for humankind.. Enough of that..well, just something to look forward to , as they (sometimes) say..

Pican Dialogue 5 (?): Reprise
(I)
It is late evening on Planet Pico and a father and son are sitting on the vast lawns in front of the structures inhabited by The Master and , naturally, his protectors. In the multicolored glow of dusk, amidst the three suns each setting at a different rate, the father is trying to explain, with patience but some tinge of exasperation, a simple lesson in computer animation to his young son who doesn't quite 'get it'----yet.
"Johhano, please try to listen to me, okay?"
"Yes....Dad". The child, anxious to understand, but still a child and filled with distractions, pouted slightly.
"Okay, then, you've seen me program this sequence before, right?"
"Yes...Dad"
"And...?"
"Well it's really really interesting dad, but I ...just can't do it.
I'm too dumb."
The father patted his son gently on the cheek and bade him confront the small round computer display screen on both their laps.."Here...."
"Ohh...I see"
"And then, just do it there? Okay."
"Simple, it looks easy...."
"Don't think, just do it."
"But it's so hard...it's soooo haard.."
"Just think, the hypersphere goes in the hypercube, the hypersphere goes out of the hypercube.. Say it!"
The child looked upon the rotating displays on the screen and once again pouted..
"Just do it darling"
"Okay....daddy.."
He took a deep breath, puffed out his reddish green cheeks and then, with a flutter of chubby young fingers, initiated the sequence...which led to a choppy but , to the father, altogether adequate version of this elementary exercise..
"I did it!!!" "I did it!!"
"Yes, you did son.."
"And it seemed so....impossible.."
"Ah, so much to learn, my child..."
"Whaa?" asked his son, fearing the worst possible wisdom from his father's correction.
"No, no, don't worry..Here, on Pico, nothing is impossible.
And that is what there is ...what is so much to learn. Okay?"
"Nothing?"
"Nothing. You are very young and that is very good...but..
nothing.."
The father and child sat together, the son hugging his father's legs, his arm around all of the son's shoulders both silently gazing past the luminous leaves through the clouds, the setting orbs, the slowly appearing stars and constellations and all that was visible in the lovely skies that night on Planet Pico.

(II)
The Master was restless and although he had not changed his shape for over a week, his container quivered with anxiety. For three days or more he had not opened his eyes, though it was clear to his protectors that at times they seemed strained with some effort of unvoiced concentration. But now, as The Master had been so quiet, they were quite busy at the other end of the corridor wrapped in a philosophical conversation they both considered quite profound but which has vanished, like much else which happens and which we deem important into the winds...
"The house...."said The Master. "The house, the home, the place..the house. Where? When? Just the house, that house, that place, then? Now? My house?"
"The place...the terrible terrible place. The house. Just a house.
The terrible place. They crucified, they poisoned, they tortured, they scapegoated, they lied...they lied..they lied..they lied..to me."
"The persecutors...they slaved me, beat me...plagues...their curses..starved, bound, beaten, cornered , neutralized.. betrayed....lied ..They lied, they lied, they lied.."
The Master's eyes opened wide and wider---an inch, two inches....half a foot, a foot, three feet...filling the whole space of his container..pupils anxiously quivering in their jelly dark, darker than the deepest black hole...
"Assassins...rebels..criminals...villains...exilers..liars..liars..."
"Just a house? A house? Only in a house? When, when, when? Everytime? Then? Now!!! No...no house.."
"Then....? Only then.."
"Ah, closed closed dark endless night of finite spaces...pain..in That House..no light? none? some!!! Cramped, entangled, warped spaces..can't breathe..can't think...can't hear...can't see..can't cogitate...can't imagine...grey and white..no colors..nothing...something?"
"Not just the House? More? More and more? Everything? No, it was just...a splinter..Light..ahhh...more light..spinning..hahaha
ahhh..more...space..light..beautiful!!! beautiful!!!"
The Master's eyes had returned to their normal size and his expression had relaxed..He seemed to nod to himself almost rhythmically, silently except to himself ...and then "In...fin...ite"
"Not the house....the in...fin...ite.." And then he smiled and apparantly went off to a long, deep, unclouded sleep.

III
It was already night and a billion billion stars were out. As always at this time, and especially on hollidays, which naturally were nearly all the time, the master fireworks displayers had arranged a special show for those who cared to pass by. Against the black sky and the streaks of glittering stars...you saw the shimmering popping brilliant clouds of fireworks, which occasioned the delight of adults as well as children. And then of course the music...but of that what can one say? The music is the music is the music...

Back To Top


The Case for Anti-Semetism  -  Paul Nachbar

 Issues of the Middle East --Judaism, Christianity and Islam, Zionism and Palestine, Imperialism, Colonialism, the struggle for national identity as well as justice for individuals and nations--- have naturally popped up and at times taken center stage here, in groups far removed from any direct political conflict. As always, whether in what I would regard as a Major Issue --- can there be genuine peace?--or a Minor Issue-- you're not perceiving me, you're perceiving an "American Jew from New York"--I have staunchly --and perhaps somewhat boringly--taken a gung-ho humanistic, liberal and mostly pro-Israeli stance. Well, enough of that..
   Here, I thought it would be interesting, instead of confronting the beast (or at least one of them) head on, to take the devil's advocate point of view and express--in
language which I will inform you now to be a total lie---the case against Jews, Israel, the West, democracy, etc. The amazing thing about this --I am writing this introduction after having composed the essay--is how easy it is to genuinely distort things and appeal to the baser instincts of the reader. Of course, there are perhaps many who would substantially agree with this essay, though few would argue openly a "Case for Anti-Semitism"...I implore them to please correct some of the details I may have missed in their argument..after all, as I have always been the first to admit, I am very very far from perfect..

Paul Nachbar     


   They are different from the rest of us and I know best what this means. Although, out of our great kindness, they have benefited from the benevolence of our Christian Institutions---and have, in fact, piggybacked their way to no small manner of international success-- they are not yet 'among us.'  They are different, aloof, prefer to stick to themselves and their own ideas, to intermarry amongst themselves; among themselves, they conspire against our gentle institutions, despite our good nature. Indeed, when one Jew succeeds in a particular field, whether journalism or business, he opens the door wide so that others will follow, until he succeeds in wresting control through vicious competition with you, the naive friendly open Christians. Indeed, is not the press of the United States--and other countries---secretly just part of their arsenal? Is not the international banking system under their control. Awake, oh unconscious members of the superior races: the enemy is inside your door.
   Here of course the Jew--always the eternal Jew--exaggerates his plight and we know that. Have we not publicly apologized for the excesses of Mr Hitler, that madman from the long, long distant past? Have not our most benevolent historians not written massive tomes detailing his individual peculiarity, his distance from the good ones, the evolved and free and friendly ones, that is, the rest of us? Thus it is out of mere deceit and  malice that the Jew reminds us of these long past catastrophes which were really nobody's fault at all.  Let us see in these whines and complaints not the external visage, which is in fact moving to the sympathetic bystander, but the internal motivations: selfishness, clannishness, a desire to overthrow the goodness of the existing order, a parasitical nature peculiar to his race and to the ethics expressed in the Old Testament. Let us move on, that is, to the present... to more important things...though we shall sigh for a moment in remembrace of those six million Jews slaughtered by this madman---among the tens of millions of other Europeans who died of the tyrannies of a former era. They are no longer important and these facts...have nothing to do with our present concerns..
    Here, once again, under our naive protection, the Jew has established himself through theft and murder and deceit in Palestine, that which he alone calls Israel.
Once again, under the facade of democracy, of humanism and of liberalism, he has deceived us, again with the aid, to be sure, of the Jewish press. Arise, oh Christians yet to be informed of what truly is, and understand how this somewhat sympathetic victim---or sympathetic for a day---has dispossessed a truly good people, the Muslims, who have been, in all that is important at this time,  far more compatible with our values and interests. And besides, there are 1.2 billion of them and only a small handfull of Jews. Here you must look deep and ignore the existence of Arab parties in the Israeli government: this is mere treachery.  Here you must look beneath the veil of supposed freedom which has existed in Palestine and see the genuine core of things: a small, fanatical group which has conspired to undermine and rule Christiandom, not to speak of the rest of the world, for thousands of years.
Let not their surface appearances deceive you: they are the culpable ones as your fathers and your father's fathers had realized long ago.
    Here, of course, with your modernistic sentiments induced mostly by the Jewish press, you might feel revulsion at certain elements of the Muslim world: the capital and corporal punishment which exists in nearly all Arab legal systems; the willingness of Arab leaders to rule for decades by virtual fiat; and the regrettable tendency in certain countries, such as Iraq and Lebanon, for leaders to simply exterminate an unpopular minority; and the tendency of Arab countries to accept generations of Soviet aid. But you must understand--and can only understand this if you look deeply into the problem-- that such concepts are altogether foreign to Islam, which has always been a totally peaceful religion--unlike Judaism to be sure---and are mostly due to the negative influence of  Western imperialism. Yes, oh kind, sensitive and educated Christian: you know full well, and feel responsible for it, that many of your cultural victories were at the cost of brutality. And you know full well that cultures subjected to the iron boot of imperialism find it almost impossible to recover..
    Yes, of course it is difficult for you, since you might think about the catastrophe of September 11, 2001 in New York City. What, you might ask yourself, would happen if they decided to bomb US? But rest assured that those 3000 some odd lives that were lost represent only a plea for help and reason in a world which has viciously turned against Islam and Arabs per se, which is the only  real and dangerous form of  anti-Semitism. After all, if you appeal to the deceived and stupid government of the United States to listen to reason, to simply abandon 'their' Israel which is the vision only of a disloyal and treacherous minority, then you would have nothing to worry about. Think how easy things would be then and how peaceful.
An Israel cut off from this corrupt American aid would simply be annihilated by the virtuous and victimized democratic majority. And though one might shed a tear or two for such lives lost in the rough free-for-all that nations are accustomed to, it really would not be your responsibility, after all.  For, to be reasonable now---did they intermarry with you, did they adopt your values, did they adhere to your ideas of how they were supposed to act in a Christian Civilization? Here, you may answer the question yourselves...guiltlessly to be sure.
      And then of course, while not all wrongs may be righted, it is clear that our actions will radically influence the Arab world.  There is no justification in the Koran
for extremist acts, as anybody (who has not read the book) can see: it is only our extreme policies which would produce a bin Laden or a Sadaam Hussein. Let us forgive, let us forget, let us bury the hatchet. And then the Christian and the rising and healthy Muslim worlds may be at one, with free and happy trade among the victorious (eg., surviving) partners.  And here you may lay rest your conscience,
for if there are victims in this exchange, it is altogether clear that they brought it down upon themselves....and if not, well, who would possibly care? The world certainly does not., as is self-evident..  

Back To Top


 Toy Soldiers/Goods and Services   -  Paul Nachbar
(1)

 Yesterday, I had a discussion with my neighbor and offline friend, Donny. Usually the discussion flows very well between us, but this time, like a couple of other times, we were at an impasse, telling the other in pretty blunt terms that he was not listening here. Somehow, in the hours that followed, I had an inspiration; when Donny and I stopped by a 99 cent store on the way home from dinner, I picked up a bag of plastic toy soldiers, maybe 30 altogether, fixed in various positions and each about two inches tall. Then, we went came back to my apartment, we replayed the discussion while making reference to the toy soldiers.
   This is a bit strange, eh? Two guys in their forties playing with toy soldiers. Well, maybe not: when the leaders of an army are engaged in strategic thinking, they often use such models. Here, of course, Donnie and I, who would both be considered on the injured list, are not making global strategies but fighting for psychological survival. Both of us are rather peaceful fellows who are not that fond of conflict; both of us
have to one degree or another, been victimized by a system (and perhaps they are to some degree all the same) which rewards so-called aggressiveness and punishes so-called passivity. But since we were obviously in charge of these toy soldiers, whom we variously called the 'Israelis' and the 'Palestinians' , the 'Americans', 'Corporation A' and 'Corporation B'and the "terrorists' or, to bring back a little of fairly recent history, ' the Americans' and the 'Soviets', we had some power, at least, in this limited domain. That is we were moving them around and were not being moved around ourselves by orders of authority or some 'vast social forces ' like 'supply and demand.'
    Anyway, not sure where this leads...exactly..but it was clear to me that the 'good guys' and the 'bad guys' looked pretty much the same. That is, when you owned the toy soldiers you made the rules and were not , for instance, moved by a movie script into heroicizing- or guiltily denigrating - your own side...or demonizing the other side. Well, our arguments from earlier were mostly resolved in a creative and commonsensical manner...That is, to quote mental health system bullshit, the modality was effective.

(2)
I don't know if the world is mad or it's me at times, or both. Certainly, if I am mad, my madness has been more painful to me generally than the madness of the world eg., that which you supposedly 'cannot change'. And here, as per every authority and expert that I know of, the solution is in my hands. Well, maybe true, maybe not...
   Anyway, Donny is not working at present and I am working 7.5 hours per week as a poet, which is not what most folks would call working. Poets, to reiterate my statements of many previous posts, are creatures who are expected to be.... somewhat out of the picture, in some ivory tower, or from some mysterious foreign land...heroic...or victims...or perhaps examples of some chemical imbalance. Well, one thing is for sure, in a world which is dedicated to what might euphemistically be called the production of goods and services, poets--and an unemployed man of seemingly good physical health, Donny--are in a quandary. We are not 'useful' to society; we are not engaged in those 'real world' battles over efficiency, productivity, responsibility, reality, etc..That is , we are marginal.. ain't we? Since poetry is not exactly a good or a service and the folks with sufficient IQ to understand such poems usually do not have the dollars ready to throw them at the producing poets.
  Well, to be brief for a change, the 'real world' of 'goods and services' does not seem too bad when one owns the collection of plastic soldiers and when one is not simply a piece to be moved here or there at will  in somebody else's collection. Yes, there is something to be said for 'heroic' experience in the economy, for surviving the mad dash for efficiency or profit or whatever...but owning the soldiers gives you a new perspective. Uh, by the way, the bag of plastic soldiers cost $1.09.

Back To Top


Ah, Freedom... -  Paul Nachbar

   It is a place --and I won't specify where ---where you are told over and over again how free you are. It is a place without obvious restraints or shackles, instruments of torture, brutal-looking guards in uniforms, visible whips, chains etc etc. In fact, a list of  your freedoms and responsibilities is often publicly posted in an obvious place. You are not told where this list comes from, except with the vaguest of terms, but it is pretty clear if only implicitly that you cannot change a single item on that list. It is also quite clear and apparent that the list is a rather idealized and formal thing, filled with formal language which you did not of course write and which has virtually nothing to do with the everyday reality of this place. That is, you know that if you do what you are cajoled or told to do, in even, calm though quite repetitive tones, that everything will be okay. But if you violate any of the perhaps thousands of rules which are not written down---and which are nowhere specified in that often touted list of freedoms and responsibilities , then you are apt to be in big trouble. You also know, since everybody or nearly everybody apparently obeys the mysterious authority which never quite shows itself publicly, that there is nobody on your side, who would be willing to stick out his or her neck for your sake. They are 'too busy'; they have other 'pressing affairs'; they are preoccupied with 'practical matters'...and have no time for you. Besides, if they raised a peep or looked the wrong way when you were nabbed for one or another vague and inappropriate action, they would be subject to the same punishment or worse----since their agreement with you would constitute a conspiracy against any authority which ran this place.
  Here, as I have hinted, the torment and instruments of punishment are mainly psychological. That is, they leave no scars, no traces. Occasionally, one or another of the folks who run this place will inform you, with some pride, how much "evolution" there has been in similar institutions. Obviously then, since you do not perceive this "evolution" in the slightest, this must mean that you are reactionary in your point of view, which is distorted or defective. They will, in a calm, educated manner, point out how in previous times and in other places, horrible things did occur, but certainly not here. They will, in a calm and educated manner point out that "others" are not at all affected by what you perceive as a strange and oppressive ambiance and will confide in you, playing to your sense of superiority, that "most people" are indeed "unconscious of such things." Perhaps they will even cite as evidence an opinion poll among the other residents of this place, polls which generally suggest that from 85% to 100% of the residents found their situation completely to their approval. And, if you are not convinced by such a document, which is belayed by every whispered comment made by the other residents --things they will of course not repeat in public--- they will, with some degree of appropriate irritation, make remarks about your weakness, hypersensitivity, self-pity, propensity to blaming others for your problems, attitude, lack of character.....all factors in your makeup which are highly subjective, not provable either way of course except in the eyes of the beholder. And you know here that your comments ---which they jump on in 2 seconds for any minute errors in logic that would be acceptable in any other context--or your observations really ,simply, do not count here. That is, they count for....nothing.
   The people who run this place, whom you are generally though not always encouraged to address on a first name basis, are very, very concerned about you--your health, your functioning, your well-being. They do not wish you to ingest any substances which may affect your thinking, except those perhaps which the kind doctors that they occasionally call upon will prescribe. They do not wish you to read anything which is too upsetting, particularly books which relate to what they would regard as "old history" or "old grievances." No, they do not of course ban such things outright, but they do their best ---and this is almost always effective --
to make you feel as if your general curiosity about the history or philosophy or reality of this place was somehow odd, eccentric and very, very bizarre..After all, what you see is what you get and....are things REALLY so bad?
    If you are uneducated or have come from hunger, the place is , of course, something of a land of opportunity except that you know where you stand in the eyes of the kind people who are in control. If you are uneducated or not terribly verbal, you tremble before their power and are ashamed of your trembling, though you know that you cannot win any argument against such folks since you do not have the tools. You do the small, light labor that you generally "volunteer" for with extra effort, often spending hours at a cleaning task ,  for instance, which a reasonable person, or a person who was not here.....would casually perform in ten minutes. You know your impulses are brutal, you know your anger is just below the surface, but you have no way to think things through. So you simply repeat the same behaviors, ever watchful for the disapproving eye. And you play the child with the kind authorities, exposing all of your tender --and mostly concocted--problems (as opposed to the real ones)--in order to avoid punishments. Not to do so is folly since you know, despite the civilized atmosphere of the place, that you have no rights whatsoever.. Best here to play the subordinate role with gusto, to praise the kind overseers to their faces, to lower one's eyes before the authorities and above all, to keep all of one's possessions and language very very simple and very very plain. To play the religious naif, for instance and talk endlessly about one's attempts to be good and the lovely prospect of a heaven beyond all of this.... mostly acceptable earthly domain. To read the bible, or look as if one is reading the bible, watch one's language at all times and above all else, maintain purity and simplicity of speech before those who can well punish you if they chose to do so.
    Ah, if you are educated, however, or intelligent, you know that there are problems --as I had indicated. You know that your thinking is clear and you know what the game is here and you become what they term "cynical", "apathetic" or "nihilistic"----the terms of psychological abuse used for intelligent residents.
They will take one look at your expressive face, whether you say anything or not and immediately assert their authority with one slightly sharp suggestion or another. And then they will offer you, in words that are quite vague and completely insincere, a "choice".. You of course respect this since you are not, deep down, a slave and dislike the "necessary" infringements upon your freedom here. You have, they tell you in private, the necessary intelligence to rise in the ranks, to cease being a mere resident or "child" and become one of the "gang", one of "us", one of the "decision-makers".
    Of course, they add, this will take a great great deal of work, meaning education, but you respect education-- at least in theory--and half-want to go along with it.
Besides, it is clear, given their confiding in you in this manner, that merely being just another resident in this place is dissatisfying. Why be just one among many when one can, with the enormous effort of education, earn the ability to crack the psychological whip? And beyond this ability , of course, are the obvious rewards of additional income. As a whip-cracker, one can earn a great deal more than the ordinary polishers and cleaners, cooks and bottle washers. Is that not an attractive future, in a place where, privately speaking though of course not publicly, nobody has any sense of any believable or enjoyable future?
    Here, of course, according to the written laws, everything is a matter of free choice. There, you can see your rights and responsibilities listed right in front of everybody. And, well, you have been singled out, too. YOU have the ability to "improve" your circumstances;  why are you not doing so? YOU are not like the others who are less capable and whom, according to them, you cannot possibly relate to. Indeed, if you are entangled with them, it is very clear to everybody concerned that you are simply using people of lesser abilities and acting beneath yourself. Yes, alas, and whether such accusations are true or not, they are almost irresistible. YOU have a conscience; YOU do not wish to use others; YOU do not wish to live with an accusation of this sort which has the slightest bit of merit to it because you essentially do not hierarchies amongst people, at least not of the artificial (seemingly) variety. But of course, as the kind if somewhat sarcastic authorities whisper to you, 'this is sheer idealism' on your part. And what could be worse than that?
    Ah, what can you do, you mutter to yourself: rebel or conform? Both are rather futile because rebellion is crushed without complaint from the others within ten seconds ---or crushed within you by an endless process of repetition of their psychological "observations" regarding your crimes and misdemeanors...and conformity is without pleasure. You are tempted to join the authorities here , since it seems to be the only option, but this would be a destruction of your self.
So you flounder, half-obeying and half-disobeying, half accumulating the credentials you need to free yourself from an unspoken tyranny and half tossing them away into the waste bin of your personal errors. Obviously, you are not getting anywhere here, are neither fish nor fowl, but what can you do? They tell you that there is something wrong with your thinking, with your speaking, with your presentation. You wonder, of course, what any of this has to do with the actual situation but then you are, as they whisperingly remind you --off the record --completely alone here: "we do not write these things down" and "there is nobody on your side."
      In any event , you frustrate yourself enormously and have now become a virtual prisoner of your anger, fear and pain. You are not...anything..despite the daily assurances of all the others that you deeply, deeply matter to the rest. You are afraid that you might become, because of such deep sensitivity and passion, what they refer to as a "danger to self and others". Ah, and then you will be truly punished, though naturally without the whips and chains. You will be forcibly isolated from other people except for your  guardians; you will be forced to repeat, over and over, the lessons regarding virtues which you obviously have either forgotten or never learned: stability, obedience, consistency...in the most primitive ways possible under the circumstances. And you will be forcibly given various chemical substances which both "calm you down" for the sake of "adequate functioning" as well as diminish all sensitivity and passion. This of course, in your brooding confusion, is a matter of deepest dread..and everything is now a risk, even the slightest slip in terms of what they kindly regard as being 'performance.'
    Best here --they tell you and you begin to believe--to distract yourself, watch mass entertainment on the television and particularly sports, beauty contests, shows which figure ideal or comic versions of the nuclear family but which are not controversial . Best here to watch plenty of sports, whether or not you ever enjoyed sports. Best here, given the intensity and duration of your pain, to desensitize yourself to situations which others, quite obviously, would be completely oblivious to. After all, do NORMAL people dwell on the past? No, you do not see any normal people dwelling on the past...they are far too busy with highly important affairs of their own..Heck, in the marathon of life, they are all passing you by...and what's your excuse here? Only self-indulgence if you want the prevailing opinion. There, go read a book on this particular subject---and there is a whole library of such books, maybe even endless libraries..
    Occasionally, if you survive this --which many do not-- you will get the kindly confidence of one of the people who run this place, perhaps an administrator :"I do not know anybody who is doing what they want to do with their life" or even "you're stronger than you think". Of course such remarks were never uttered, since there is nothing wrong with the picture here except your own sensitivity, childishness, moodiness, etcetera. Perhaps these difficulties with "reality" even constitute a kind of dyslexia? While others read experience forwards and in sequence, you jumble the letters and are not perceiving things as they clearly are. You will also remember the advice you had heard at an earlier stage from one of the kindly staff, that it is "all ultimately up to you."Well, this connotes both possibility as well as a type of inevitable pessimism. After all, how strong is any particular individuality when it is not daily affirmed and confirmed by the group? How much can anybody really change his or her lot beyond, say, the measurable factors of income or frequencies --though not quality- of social contact? And what examples can you point to of anybody who has accomplished this vague, rather nebulous goal? Christ, Socrates--martyrs of faith and reason in life, though celebrated in death..But you are not...by nature....a believer, though you would occasionally like to be. Because, quite frankly, you are just not simple.
    You function, you do not chose this or that, you obey to the extent that you can stomach it yet your mind is a haze and you know that and that is a source of pain. Perhaps you write some poems about the whole experience...Yet you know, not being one of those who were, as they say 'born yesterday' (do any of these folks REALLY exist?) that you cannot perform the miracle of transforming 'the poem', that ostensibly subjective statement, into one's daily bread and wine, loaves of fish etc. You despair perhaps, flounder again or perhaps experience a 'writer's block'...this is presuming you got far enough to actually call yourself a writer, which is an act of no small arrogance, and not simply another victim of a situation beyond one's own small powers of control. And how can you truly call yourself a writer anyway,  when it is clear that the only reality here is those who tell others what to do and those who must do as they are told? And what is writing anyway, but ...words, words, words?
(to be continued) Paul

Back To Top


An Essay on Worry - by Paul Nachbar

 Some people worry about the environment, others worry about social injustice. While others worry about economic matters: their profit and loss; their wages and salaries; their failure or success;their getting or keeping a job, or even having the basic necessities of life.
  Some people worry about perfection or the ideal. Others worry about good versus evil. Many worry about the spread of disbelief - or of belief-- in one particular idea or another. Others simply worry about crime. There are those who worry about - or for - the rich, the poor and the middle class--and about - or for- this or that institution:
the family, the state, the church, the city, the industry etc.
   Some people worry about the terrible effects of war; others, if one can imagine it, worry about the terrible effects of peace. Some worry about the end of the world or even the beginning of a new one. There are those who worry about the past, the present and the future, in one manner or another.
   Some people worry about their looks, their height, their age, their personality, behavior, values, ability, intelligence etc.
   Others worry about disease or accident. Some worry about death while others naturally worry about life. And of course some worry about Major Things and others about Minor Things, and there are those who mistake worries about Major Things for Minor Things and vice versa.
   And there are those of course who profess no worries. Maybe some of these tell the truth-I'm not really sure.
    Having worried about all these things, I now worry about myself. Is this so vain, in a world of wants and needs, to worry simply about the self, whatever THAT may be? Is this so SELFISH or egotistic?? Now I don't think so, for I realize that what I had deemed to be an angry, bitter, often cruel chorus of criticism from others-and I mean over many years, even decades--has also been worry about me, particularly that I become "me" and that this "me" is necessary, at least to some, as "they" are necessary to "me." And in this I think- or hope- there is a "good"- or that there can be.

Yours,
Paul
The Worrier in Chief lol

Back To Top


Below is an autobiographical fragment: - Paul Nachbar    

  For years I was preoccupied with a beautiful woman I had met for maybe an hour. I drew her picture, which I subsequently lost; I obsessed about her; at one point I called her father to try to make contact with her, an attempt that failed; and then ultimately I called her college alumni service and found out that she had not only married but had changed her first name to a Hebrew name. In other words, she disappeared. I tried to look her up on the internet and in fact spent hours doing so, without success. She disappeared. Her name was Annie Hurowitz, a slightly unusual name which I found again yesterday --not her, but somebody else by that name--on the cover of an enormously thick book documenting the persecution of the Jews in Nazi-Occupied France.
   Here it was spelled Anny, by the way, and showed up in a reproduction of the identity papers of a little girl. I guess one cannot escape. history, though I have certainly tried to do so, in typical American style, by every means possible.. I didn't read through this volume to see what had happened to her,  whether she had survived or not. I was too sad. But she was, I guess, the cover girl for a book about the virtual extinguishing of a culture, a book which appeared to be very well put together, read perhaps by a few intellectuals and probably disregarded en masse, without any specific mention, by a "popular", that is, mostly Christian, audience. It was one of those things that "we don't want to hear about", "we" being both the folks who live two miles from me in a very affluent town called Garden City as well as the "common man", who's had enough of his own persecution and doesn't want to hear even more about the unpleasant fate of a people--or race, he still believes, or affluent snobbish elite, he imagines, or somewhat "deviant" though mostly tolerated religion--who are, in his view, not only "doing better than him", but are probably, in his view, among  the forces behind his degradation in a capitalist society which is, at times, viciously competitive and, in any case, offers him. little genuine protection. Easy to blame it still, in emotional terms, on the same minority which the despised Hitler had tried to exterminate.
 He is no Hitler, of course,--and no Stalin too- and is horrified by any association behind his "common sense" sociology  about "the Jews" and the Great Murders in Europe.which had "nothing to do with him." Besides, the whole subject forces him to "think" too much  and he resents that because "thinking" of course, does not pay in our "modern" and "consensual" democracy. Thinking "too much" will make him unpopular, it will lead to the atheistic and communistic notions which are but an unholy tease to him, or perhaps violence or the "passivity" of Eastern religions
which go against the grain of all his upbringing; it will erode his morale, it will lead him to think of "negative" subjects in a time and place where this is uncalled for, unpatriotic and above all, impractical.
. And besides, all these things happened a long time ago and we all know in America that it's best not to "dwell on the past" or talk about "old history." So, he'll pick up another beer, or another joint, or another cigarette, or another pill his psychiatrist had prescribed for him --isn't everybody seeing a psychiatrist these days, even the working man?-  maybe even his guitar, or another copy of some glossy rag he certainly doesn't respect but reads anyway, and choke down his feelings because his feelings aren't called for.and nobody would listen anyway because "nobody is on his side," not the press, not the experts, not higher management which has somehow gotten it's teeth into so much of  the social pie, not those laughable organizations which still call themselves "unions" and certainly not the successful professional women whom he half admires and half fears who are busy trying to break through the "glass ceiling" in whatever industry. and certainly, except in a fantasy movie like "Dirty Dancing" , do NOT side with him., in fact, treat him somewhat like an insect., albeit one who might "improve" through goal-based psychological counseling.    
  This of course has nothing to do with my Annie, right, who wasn't "mine" to begin with except that she had posed for a portrait, told me that SHE was "great"
whereas her friend Jill was very "self-destructive" and had no "concentration." The Annie who had gotten her bachelors at Harvard in cognitive psychology and who seemed so well-organized, though I had met her at a program for people with
"psychiatric disabilities".? Who, later, it turned out, had married --and most of these folks did NOT get married or reproduce --an orthodox, perhaps even Hassidic, that is, "reactionary" Jew- despite her intensive and "Americanized" education.? And why should I "go for" Annie anyway, though of course this was an affair led mostly in my imagination? Why should I be so romantic here and of course, the impliciation being, dedicated to "my own kind"? Weren't there "plenty of other girls"; why should I be so "preoccupied with this one"?
Wasn't I being "too sensitive"? And why, anyway, did I not , at the time, actively pursue Annie as a suitor, which was of course the "practical" thing to do?
  Between Jill and Annie, Annie of course was the one who looked healthy, well put-together, lovely, etc., though as Jill, at one time her friend, put it, "Annie had never worked..."  I do not know if this were true or not, but it was a damning remark  (to be continued...maybe)

Back To Top


[picosociety] "It's Only High IQ Drivel But I Like It..

I LikeIt..(I Guess?) - Paul Nachbar

 

Quite often though not with great  seriousness- I wish that I had been born into another time and place. "Another time and place" means either, depending on my mood, a time and place which was more exciting or one which was more peaceful, or at least more  peaceful in terms of those conflicts I find very irritating in our "modern" times.
  For instance, I occasionally wish that I had been born into a time and place before that great instition of Modern Psychology- or Modern Psychiatry for that matter-
had been invented. There, according to my fantasy, I would have been untroubled by a whole host of innovations which form some of the dominant topics of discussion here and elsewhere...
     And then of course  I never would have heard of such concepts as standard deviation, the norm, range and domain, GPA, Most Competitive Colleges, aptitude, achievement, regression to the mean, precocity, supergenius,genius, talent, giftedness, superior, average, retardation, behaviorism, experiments with mazes and rats, animal testing, ADD, MPD, OCD, schizophrenia,  manic-depression, narcissism, mourning,  only-child syndrome, personality disorder, schizogenic families, special education, workaholism, dysfunctional families, juvenile delinquency, autism with its variations ,behaviors,  DSMIV, factor analysis, correlations, transference, counter-transference, repression, sublimation, regression, idealization, internalization, identification, suppression, aggression, passivity, alienation, anomie, agitation, stress, sex-roles, the Peter Pan syndrome,  passive-aggression, introspection, ideation, competitive vs cooperative activities, introversion vs extroversion, play therapy, anorexia, bulemia, incidence of homosexuality, androgyny, the orgasm male and female, sexual disorders, impotence, homophobia, hierarchies of values, self-actualization, lieben und arbeiten, learning disorders, thought disorders, personality disorders, character disorders, adolesence, child psychology, couple therapy, artificial intelligence, reality testing, socialization, deviance, adjustment, psychopathy,  sociopathy, empathy vs sympathy, genetic components, nature vs nature, personality types, trait psychology, functioning, differentiation, maturation, sexual differentiation, tolerance, alternative lifestyles and a whole bunch of other concepts banging around in my poor head --though they certainly did not originate there- waiting for their next exorcism.
  There I would have sat, I guess, (and this is just one example of course) in my little house on the prairie, being far more concerned with "concrete" matters --which of course I would not refer to as "concrete" matters or "reality", raising my pigs and cows and sheep, fending off what I'd probably refer to as "wild injuns",  reading -if I could read--maybe a family bible handed down over the generations, digging the wells, paying the preacher and the teacher, planting the crops, saying my prayers.and trying not to get involved with those more rootless folks who were interested in stealing all of my hard-won property.--the outlaws.
  Of course I guess it's equally possible --pardon the American framework here but I am an American and there ARE worse frameworks---that I could have been born one of those 'wild injuns', in which case I'd probably be concerned with hunting my buffalo, building my tepees, praying to the Great Spirit,  defending my lands against the incursions of these white barbarians,  negotiating the seasons, building my canoes, tending to the animals,  smoking my peace pipe or eating my peyote buttons in search of visions and a bunch of other Native American things which likewise had nothing to do with Modern Psychology or Psychiatry.   
  I don't know if things, alas, were better then. Certainly we live a lot longer, if SOME of this can be called living. Certainly we're more apt to benefit from modern medicine, though I find that negotiating one's way through some of the labyrinths
of so-called health care takes far more skill than most online iq tests, to say the very least. On the other hand, perhaps, most of what we learned is sort of, well, uh, ahem...crap? Hm..ahem..well..cough..I'm not sure.
  Still I guess...I like this time and place and..I'm not one to go back to playing cowboys and Indians, or Jews and Nazis for that matter. If I am civilized and discontented, well then I am civilized and discontented,so what? That's the way I
am and more importantly,that's the way WE are. We are flawed, we are wordy, we engage in "meaningless" disputes-so what? We are who we are, which sucks of course a lot of the time but is not only okay, but I guess, inevitable..As I said in my title "It's Only High IQ Drivel But I Like It..I Like it (I Guess?).

 

Back To Top

 

 


Thought You Might Like To See This - Paul Nachbar    
 

My father told me several years ago, a couple of years before he passed away from a heart-attack that it was time for me to stop being the "angry young man", and that in fact, "angry young men" went out of style in the 1960's.
I could neither fully accept nor reject such a remark, because it contained a grain of truth, if not the whole truth and because my father was my father and I only had one father. Of course the remark was, in and of itself, both
condescending to me as well as intolerant and unaccepting of my thoughts and feelings. My thoughts and feelings were okay, chez mon pere, if I expressed them in an organized and appropriate fashion. That is to say, he was not a completely awful father, just a practical one. Still towards the end of his life, my father--who complimented me very rarely - told me that I was on "another level" from him and could "beat him at every game." Now what of course does that have to do with being an "angry young man" and what does THAT have to do with anything else?
        When you are mature and self-satisfied, aware of your limitations etc.etc you are supposed to give up "the angry young man", perhaps even exorcise him or even, at times scapegoat him when he appears somehow in some other angry young man whom you encounter. You are supposed to play it safe, be more 'conservative', adjust your expectations downward, give up certain "naive" ideals, accept the lies and half-truths your family told you and stop asking fundemanetal questions about the nature of "reality". Oh yeah, to be more "concrete", you are also supposed to cut one's hair to a reasonable length, get rid of "that beard", stop smoking, drinking, drugging or whatever other "self-destructive" habits you have and just sit at that vast card game of the bourgeoisie (the angry young man's term for it, usually), putting up a poker face in order to maximize one's individual earnings and minimize one's losses.
       Well, dad, wherever you are right now --and I think that that is nowhere, given my absence of certain beliefs ---I think that you are wrong. Most of the time, I am not the "angry young man" any longer, any more than I am a teenager, a child or a foetus but that is still a part of my identity and I will not abandon it in the interests of collective peace, the greatest good for the greatest number, what affluent housewives deem appropriate, or whatever rating systems exist for the creative and intellectual work that I produce. That is, whereas I now ask questions which are not simply fundamental questions and spent more time on my budgeting of resources than previously, as well as seeing the "other's point of view", I am still angry, and that is a source of my energy. Without my "inner angry young man", I'm just a middle-aged professor manque or else somebody merely going through a "transitional period" before he adjusts to "reality" and goes back to school in order to get a "real profession" eg., not just being a part-time poet. And this is something that I refuse to do.
        I also do not wish to scapegoat other "angry young men" who have reached conclusions quite different from my own and who are, in terms of global politics, my natural enemy. Whereas I blamed other parties for the injustices, absurdities and idiocies of the world, I find these other "angry young men" blaming my stock and my nation and my self-interest and although I find their statistics a bit off and their interpretations of such statistics quite narrow-minded, I still applaud their anger because "the world" is a place which is in many ways injust, absurd and idiotic. Also because I on some level am no more innocent than the individuals and groups I once blamed. If I had once, with long theses and many angry social gestures, blamed the "Nazis" and the "bourgeoisie" or the "religious right" for the world's problems, others, with similarly long theses blamed the so-called "Communists" "the Jews" , the "left-leaning media". As a more mature historian of society, I see now that both arguments were rather fallacious, but anger is kind of beyond reasonable proof and beyond this for some reasons which are actually good and perfectly moral ones--maybe "too" moral in some ways.
        I write my poems as my dayjob and I generally eschew organized politics of any kind. Poetry gives one insight into the individual human heart and all hearts --no matter what the social masks which conceal them---are pretty much the same.But I do not eschew the reasons for the anger--the injustices, idiocies and absurdities--or really wish to censor extreme "points of view" in this regard because, whatever the truth value of their statements, the anger is pretty much the same.Without this anger, of course, there is no change or else, only the changes which emerge from the trickle-down effects of unleashed capitalism., which are both good and bad. Thus I cannot escape politics, though I disavow the usual politics of any group, which stems from self-interest. Boy, what a life,eh?
       A few years ago, a woman whom I did not get "involved" wtih but probably had some interest in marrying me asked the question, "when will Paul finally settle DOWN?" Well, I guess due to time and entropy and a collection of old battle scars, I have settled down somewhat but I guess the real-belated- answer to this question is, "Oh yeah...probably when I drop dead. And you?"

 

Back To Top

 

 


World Trade Center Issues - JONATHAN MARIN

WORLD TRADE CENTER MEMORIAL:

What is the scarcest, most precious, most sought after commodity in downtown Manhattan?  What does downtown need more than anything else? ? Parking!!

Why not dedicate one corner of the WTC site to be a huge multistory parking garage? Each space should have the name of one of the victims neatly painted in the family's color of choice at the head of the space, filling the whole width between the yellow lines. For families who prefer to memorialize their loved one with something a liittle more formal, a tasteful bronze plaque should be provided to them at cost. Also, accredited family members should be entitled to park there free for 15 years. That’s more than reasonable, and should prevent any of them griping about appropriateness.

SURVIVING SPOUSES

Among the groups whose long term future income has been adversely affected by the trade center attack, there’s one group that scarcely gets a mention. Divorce lawyers. Most of the 2,800 victims were married. Since half of all marriages end in divorce, the 9/11 attack prevented at least a thousand divorces.

In an average divorce, about a third of the community property goes to pay the lawyers. Obviously, the attack saved about half of the men who lost their wives from having to live for years in a furnished room, cooking on a hot plate and scrimping to pay child support. Or living under an assumed name and constantly dodging to stay clear of the "Deadbeat Dads" squads. It saved half of the women from trying to raise latchkey children, scrounging to make ends meet on a single mother’s income supplemented by inadequate or nonexistent child-support.

Even without a dime of settlement, the attack was, for half the surviving spouses, the biggest windfall they’ll ever have. Some of the winners probably know who they are, most probably don’t. But you can’t argue with statistics. I suggest that one sixth (a half of a third) of all the settlements that spouses get from the government and the Red Cross should go to a fund for needy divorce lawyers. Fair is fair.

Back To Top


Jon's Auto-Chef - JONATHAN MARIN

 

In the spirit of my junkmail-driven perpetual motion machine, I offer:                 
                       
Jon's Auto-Chef
Components:

             1. A microwave oven.
             2. A treadmill, with heating elements under a flexible metalized belt.
             3. An AC generator, powered by the treadmill, feeds current to run

                 the oven, which heats the elements beneath the belt. 
Operation:

            Place the treadmill in the oven. 

            Place the chicken on the treadmill.

            Close the door. 

            As the chicken walks on the treadmill belt, it generates electricity that

                powers the oven and heats up the belt. 

            The faster she goes, the hotter it gets.

            The hotter it gets, the faster she goes. 

            Without any external energy source, the chicken cooks herself!!

Caution:   Not suitable for fish or walrus.

              Not suitable for horses or other hoofed creatures.

 

Back To Top

 

 


Fun Fun Fun - Quinn Tyler Jackson

From one of my weekly lecture notes -- the week dealing with productivity and workplace comfort...  In application development jargon, today means tomorrow morning.
Tomorrow means next week. Next week means in about a month. In about a month means, "Are you kidding me?" Expressions such as "First Quarter Next Year," are the kiss of death. Well, not exactly, but you get the idea. The best laid plains of mice and men often went awry before there was any such thing as computers.  Especially in small shops, many things are going on at the same time. Phones are ringing with support calls. If you are a coder, and have to answer the phone to discuss what a help file already explains, you may lose one or two hours of productivity for that day. Once you get your rhythm back ... the phone rings again. You pick it up. The software is causing a General Protection Fault on the latest version of the operating system. You take down the details. Two hours later (and fifteen minutes before it's time to head home), you are back into your groove. Welcome to one of the reasons behind "tomorrow means next week."

So, you ask for an office with a door. Sorry. That would mean you were management or something. You ask to be able to put incoming calls directly to your box. No—the customer comes before anything else. If you are a stellar developer, try petitioning for a comfortable chair.  You may get that. Pretend it's a door.

This is not to imply that management is cruel. Simply put, the programmer is the low mask on the totem pole, and if you get a door, and management doesn't give everyone on the floor a door, you will earn a lot of enemies amongst your peers. Management is simply looking out for your best interests.

Is it any wonder that "next month" also means, "My back hurts"?
Respect is something you earn. A door is some-thing you dream about.
Productivity is something management insists on. Next week is the place dreams are made on. Now you know why coffee was invented. It powers the software industry, for if we sleep, we dream, and if we dream, next week catches up with us and we have to roll on that product we promised just before the phone rang.

Back To Top

 

Return to Top